The real differences between the two dozen or so Democrats seeking the presidential nomination in 2020 are trivial. But it’s still a lot of fun to speculate on the outcome. For the benefit of anyone betting on the election, I’ll share my odds.
So far,
22 Democrats have announced their bids for the Presidency. In my
last post, I described the probabilities I had assigned to the Democratic
long-shots. This time, I’ll talk about the heavyweights, starting with the Senator
Kamela Harris.
If the Democratic
voters who want someone younger and more energetic can coalesce around another
candidate, then Biden will be easily beatable; if they can’t, he will likely be
the nominee. With this in mind, I’m saying that Biden’s chances are one in four.

Kamala Harris – 1 in 12
Harris
has a strong fundraising operation and is doing well in the polls – as of my
writing this post, she stands at fourth place in the RealClearPolitics national
average, and I’m giving her the fourth spot among potential nominees.
Harris’
advantages are fairly straightforward: She already holds an important office –
Senator from California – with more constituents than anyone else except the
President and Vice President. She is also young, energetic, and female, which
is exactly what a big fraction of the Democratic base wants in a champion to take
on President Trump.
One of
the few criticisms against Harris to come from the Left is that, in her earlier
career as an attorney general, she has done things some things that anger the
criminal justice reform movement. I do not think this will be a big deal; for
instance, it was Hillary Clinton who came up with the concept of a ‘super-predator’
back in the ‘90s, and she still got the nomination last time around.
But even
though Harris looks strong and popular at present, it’s still too far out to
say whether her day in the sun will last. Overall, I rate her chances at one in
twelve.
Elizabeth Warren – 1 in 10
Warren,
like Harris, is a female senator from a liberal state with solid Democratic
credentials and a burning desire to take on the Donald. She offers a somewhat
different flavour of leftism than Harris does, as Warren is older older and
more willing to promise economic upheaval, but for the most part, her advantage
lies in her better name recognition.
RealClearPolitics
puts Warren at third place in their polling average, and I put her at third
place in my odds chart, with one chance in ten of getting the nomination.
(And just
in case you’re wondering, actual Democrats don’t care about the Pocahantas fiasco,
just like actual Republicans don’t care how many times Trump puts his foot in
his mouth.)
Bernie Sanders – 1 in 5
Bernie
Sanders is in a strong position going into this primary. People know who he is
and what he stands for. There is a strong suspicion among the Democratic base
that if Sanders had been nominated last time, Donald Trump would never have
become president. Most of the voters want a firebrand this time around, and
Bernie Sanders is willing to be their man.
But
Sanders also has some liabilities. Although he got a big head start with his
2016 popularity, there is also a huge
number of rivals competing for the role of firebrand. Sanders doesn’t appeal to
the intersectionality-mongers – apparently, ‘Jew’ doesn’t qualify as an underprivileged
minority anymore – and the ‘Socialist’ label also scares some people away. It
shouldn’t – it’s a meaningless label, since all
Democrats want to expand the government – but it still does. With all that in
mind, I estimate Sanders’ chances at one in five.
Joe Biden – 1 in 4
Imagine
the following scenario: A man from one party wins the presidency, and he is hated by the other party’s base. The new
president is accused of running the country dictatorially and wrecking American
democracy at every turn. His unpopularity drives a surge in political
participation by his enemies, huge rallies and protests, and record voter
turnout in the midterms. All sorts of interesting characters cycle through the
national stage as the opposition party’s reenergized base seeks leaders who can
channel its outrage.
Then, the
party nominates the most boring and conventional of the candidates on offer.
It doesn’t
seem likely, from an intuitive standpoint, but it’s what happened with the
Republicans in 2012, when they nominated Romney, and it’s what Biden is hoping
will happen with the Democrats in 2020.
Despite
all his baggage and his inability to elicit enthusiasm from his base, Biden is
still leading in the polls. He has plenty of support from the monied interests
and business-as-usual Democrats who just want the country to continue its march
to the left with a minimum of drama.

No comments:
Post a Comment